should be restricted and considered a hate crime. So usually the first amendment protects the criminal, not the victim, and in the end the crime is prosecuted, not the feelings of the criminal. Although the number of hate crimes may seem small when compared with the incidence of other types of crimes in the United States, it can be argued that hate crimes terrorize not one victim but many, and that such assaults threaten the very fabric. No matter how reprehensible a persons thoughts seem, critics say, that person has a constitutional right to express them verbally. Hate speech doesnt have to be spoken; it can come in many other forms. Before anyone can stop these hate crimes completely, they must be eliminated slowly. In my opinion all of the so-called experts that believe that hate crime laws violate the constitution are totally wrong. So when hate crime laws extend the sentence of a criminal on the basis of his or her biased personal opinions then they argue that it violates their first amendment rights.
Subjective essays, Dbq imperialism essay, Each one teach one essay writing, Advantages of handphone essay,
I believe that for the people that oppose hate crime laws this how to start an interview narrative essay is their best argument. Hate Crime Legislation: Challenging Intolerance. Cafferty, Dennis MES TO your home: Is it Free Speech? Yet critics of hate crime laws say that although the beating and vandalism in those hypothetical cases should be punished, the sentiment underlying them should not. Hate carries across races as well.
Why you would make a good doctor essay, Advantages of community service essay, Thesis introduction essay, Being canadian essay by denise chong,